Used Car Safety Report
The BMW X5 has been awarded a 5 star Driver Protection rating in the latest Used Car Safety Rating (UCSR) report. UCSR are reported annually by the Monash University Accident Research Centre (MUARC). Ratings are estimated from data on real crashes reported to police in Australia and New Zealand and provide a very high level of confidence. The UCSR report classifies cars according to where their rating lies in relation to a best performance benchmark. The Driver Protection rating measures the relative safety of cars in preventing serious injury to their own drivers in crashes.
Driver Protection Rating
|
Rating
|
Result
|
|
Excellent
|
|
Good
|
|
Marginal
|
|
Poor
|
|
Very Poor
|
For further information on the UCSR please click here.
If you would like to view the new car safety rating produced by ANCAP please see the archived report below:
| Crash Test | Score | Maximum Score |
|---|
| Overall Score | 32.66 | out of 37 |
| Frontal Offset test | 12.66 | out of 16 |
| Side impact test | 16 | out of 16 |
| Pole test (Optional) | 2 | out of 2 |
| Bonus points | 2 | out of 3 |
Data suplied by euroNCAP
The tested model of BMW X5, with advanced seat belt reminders, was introduced in 2003.
The BMW X5 scored 12.66 out of 16 in the offset crash test. The passenger compartment held its shape well. Protection from serious chest and leg injury was marginal for the driver.
The vehicle scored 16 out of 16 in the side impact crash test. A further 2 points were scored in the optional pole test. The advanced seat belt reminder earned the vehicle 2 extra points and this gave a 5 star rating (minimum 32.5 pts).
Important note: The left-hand-drive European model was tested by EuroNCAP. Australasian specifications may vary and therefore models sold in Australasia might provide different levels of protection to those described on this page.
Safety Feature Summary
The safety feature information below is subject to change without notice. For up to date safety feature specifications for all variants, please see the safety feature table to the right or contact the manufacturer.
Dual front airbags, side airbags and head-protecting inflatable tubes are standard equipment. ABS brakes and electronic stability control are also standard.
The front seat belt buckles are mounted on the seats and the upper anchorages are adjustable. These features improve the fit of the seat belt. Pretensioners are fitted to the front seat belts to reduce slack in the event of a crash. A three point seat belt is fitted to the centre rear seat. This provides better protection than a two point seat belt.
ANCAP & UCSR Rating ExplainedThis shows the differences between the rating processes.
Find out more
Frontal Offset Test Results
|
Region
|
Score
|
Score Type
|
Maximum Score
|
|
Frontal Offset*
|
12.66
|
pts
|
(out of
16)
|
|
Head/Neck
|
4
|
pts
|
|
|
Chest
|
2.66
|
pts
|
|
|
Upper Legs
|
2
|
pts
|
|
|
Lower Legs
|
4
|
pts
|
|
The passenger compartment held its shape well in the offset crash test. The brake pedal moved rearwards by 56mm and upwards 24mm. The steering wheel hub moved rearwards 12mm, upwards 24mm and sideways 3mm. The front ("A") pillar moved 22mm rearwards. All doors remained closed during the crash. After the crash all doors could be opened with normal effort.
The airbag cushioned the head of the driver and contact was stable. Dash components were a potential source of injury for the driver and passenger knees.
Side Impact Test Results
|
Region
|
Score
|
Score Type
|
Maximum Score
|
|
Side Impact*
|
16
|
pts
|
(out of
16)
|
|
Head
|
4
|
pts
|
|
|
Chest
|
4
|
pts
|
|
|
Abdomen
|
4
|
pts
|
|
|
Pelvis
|
4
|
pts
|
|
This test simulates a fairly small car striking the driver's door of the vehicle under test. It is based on a regulation test but the regulation does not apply to vehicles with a high seat height like the X5. Such vehicles can be expected to perform relatively well in this particular side impact test.
The vehicle was eligible for an optional pole impact test, since it had head-protecting side airbags (tubes) and scored four points for the head in the side impact test. The manufacturer decided to go ahead with the pole test and the vehicle earned a further two points.
Pedestrian Summary
A separate pedestrian impact test is conducted. This test estimates injuries to pedestrians struck by a vehicle travelling at 40 km/h. The more stars the better (maximum 4 stars).
Pedestrian Rating Explained
The Australasian New Car Assessment Program (ANCAP) provides consumers with independent and transparent information on the level of occupant and pedestrian protection provided by different new car models, in the most common types of crashes, through its star rating program.
Find out more
Green Vehicle Guide
|
Combined Fuel Consumption
|
CO2
|
Greenhouse Rating
|
Air Pollution Rating
|
Overall Rating
|
|
10.7 L/100km
|
|
|
|
|
Base Model Safety Features
Legend
Standard
Not Available
Optional
No Information
The latest UCSR are based on statistics collected from car crashes in Australia and New Zealand between 1990 and 2017, where someone was killed or seriously injured. Over eight million police reported crashes were analysed in the latest UCSR.
